UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
IN RE: CUMBERLAND
MOTION IN OBJECTION TO MOTION TO STRIKE BY THE CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, JASON D. MONZACK Now comes Petitioner, Harold F. Chorney, pro se, a petitioner with property interests and an interested party in the above captioned matter and objects to the Motion to Strike and require the Chapter 7 Trustee, Jason Monzack, to provide a clarification of the basis of the $11,000 received in the estate of Cumberland Investment Corporation in settlement of a class action lawsuit against Sotheby’s and Christies and require the Trustee to provide a complete and detailed accounting of the following: 1. assets seized from the estate of Cumberland Investment Corporation, 2. assets sold from the estate of Cumberland Investment Corporation by Christies, Sotheby’s and others,
3. assets remaining in the estate of Cumberland Investment Corporation subsequent to the sales in paragraph 2 above.
1. On November 14, 2003, A STATUS REPORT, docket #759, was
issued by the Chapter 7 Trustee stating: 2. At a Hearing held on 2/24/04, Jason Monzack reported to the court that certiorari in the Supreme Court case (Appeals of the motions listed in paragraph 10 f. and 10 g. below was presented to the District Court for the District of Rhode Island, the First Circuit Court of Appeals as well as the Supreme Court of the United States) was denied and that there was a settlement in a class action lawsuit against Sotheby’s and Christies six months ago and that subsequent to a submission of a claim, $11,000 was awarded to the estate as well as a certificate usable up to May 2007, and that this was the last asset in the estate. 3. On March 8, 2004, Petitioner Harold F. Chorney filed a MOTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S MOTION TO CLARIFY THE CLASS ACTION AWARD FROM THE LAWSUIT AGAINST CHRISTIES AND SOTHEBY’S AND REQUEST CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE PROVIDE A COMPLETE AND DETAILED ACCOUNTING OF ESTATE ASSETS. 4. On March 18, 2004, a Continued Hearing was held. Mr. Monzack stated that there were some 28 claims, claiming to be secured creditors and that he would be objecting to them. He also told the court of Petitioner’s motion requesting clarification and an accounting of the assets. 5. During the March 18, 2004, Hearing, Judge Votolato asked Mr. Monzack, “Are you looking into the standing of Mr. Chorney to file such motions at this point?” Mr. Monzack indicted that he was looking into prior orders of the court. The Judge asked Mr. Monzack when he was going to object to Petitioner’s motions and was told that day or the following day.
6. The Motion to Strike, refers to the July 3, 1991, ORDER, which
states in part the following in paragraph 2,
7. Mr. Monzack has for reasons unknown not provided the court with
a complete copy of the July 3, 1991, ORDER in the Motion to Strike. The
section that he has omitted states:
8. Petitioner asserts now, as he has continuously maintained during
appeals to the District Court for the District of Rhode Island, and the First
Circuit Court of Appeals in Ca. No. 92-1780, in page 5, Brief of Appellant:
9. Petitioner asserts now, as he has continuously maintained before and since the bankruptcy, in December 1989, that there were sufficient assets to cover all debt in the estate of Cumberland Investment Corporation.
10. Petitioner and former clients of the Petitioner, whose assets were
seized but never recovered, repetitively have indicated to the court that
assets under the custody and control of Eastland Bank and the trustees in
bankruptcy, were missing and/or unaccounted for. Both Petitioner and a
former client, and interested party, named Warren Taft, sought to obtain
an accounting of the assets, seized on August 17, 1990, and the use of funds
from the 364 Agreement, dated December 12, 1990, for several years
without success, because all the motions listed below were denied: 11. In a letter dated September 13, 1994, a partial listing of missing or unaccounted for assets involving hundreds of thousands of dollars was sent to the clerk of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode Island, Jason D. Monzack, Chapter 7 Trustee, John Fitzgerald Assistant United States Trustee at the Boston Regional Office, and Sheryl Serreze, United States Trustee at the Providence, Rhode Island Office by Harold F. Chorney, Petitioner. One group of assets, more fully described in paragraphs Numbered 14, 15 and 16 below, were part of the list supplied in the September 13, 1994 letter. No one ever responded to these letters. 12. Federal judges have approved settlement in class action lawsuits in which Christies and Sotheby’s, accused of collusion in fixing commission rates, were the Defendants, both domestically and abroad. Following some of the civil actions, criminal charges were brought against A. Alfred Taubman, Chairman of Sotheby’s. 13. Newly discovered evidence from the Trustee’s report on February 24, 2004, indicates that $11,000 from the settlement of a class action lawsuit against Christies and Sotheby’s. The terms of the settlement agreement seem to indicate that approximately 1.1 Million, ($1,100,000) dollars in assets from the estate of Cumberland Investment Corporation were sold by either Christies of Sotheby’s and that a proof of claim was filed by the trustee on behalf of the estate. 14. On August 17, 1990, the Chapter 11 Trustee, and the court appointed Examiner removed assets from the premises of Cumberland Investment Corporation in Woonsocket, R.I. A transcript of the removal of the assets reveals that certain assets, recorded in the transcript, were removed. One of these of recorded assets was a group of Pre-Columbian jewelry, artwork produced before the year 1492 by the Native Indians of the Americas, in the form of amulets of frogs and other topics made of tumbaga gold.
15. During the removal of these assets, Mr. Weingarten, Examiner,
in the August 17, 1990, Transcript of the removal of the assets, taken by
Allied Court Reporters, on page 36, stated: 16. This same Pre-Columbian artwork, as referenced in paragraphs 14 and 15 above, are also referenced in both a sales proposal by Christies, dated December 27, 1990, and the Examiner’s Report, dated June 5, 1991, would have a current value in the tens of thousands of dollars. 17. Newly discovered evidence from the Trustee’s verbal report on February 24, 2004, and at the continued Hearing, held on March 18, 2004, indicate that in excess of 28 creditors, claimed to be secured creditors.
18. Republic Credit Corporation I, has made representations to the
the District Court for the District of Rhode Island, the First Circuit Court of
Appeals, and the Supreme Court of the United States, of the following: 19. On December 18, 2001, Republic and the Trustee jointly moved to distribute to Republic the Secured Creditor Fund of $224,778.00 and to abandon those assets which Spink continued to hold in full satisfaction of all claims of Republic. Republic agreed to be responsible for any fees or charges of Spink regarding those assets which Spink continued to hold.
20. In response to the Joint Motion, Petitioner, Mr. Chorney, filed
MOTION IN OBJECTION TO ABANDONING ASSETS WITHOUT AN
ACCOUNTABILITY OF ASSETS BY THE CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE,
JASON D. MONZACK and MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE. On March
14, 2001, Judge Votolato entered the following Order: (Docket 738) DISCUSSION: 1. This case is some 15 years old. 2. According to Title 11, Section 704(1) “The trustee shall collect and reduce to money the property of the estate for which such trustee serves, and close such estate as expeditiously as is compatible with the best interests of parties in interest; 3.According to Title 11, Section 704(2) “The trustee shall be accountable for all property received.” Historical and Revision Notes, Section 704, Duties of trustee: The Notes of Committee on the Judiciary, Senate Report No. 95-989, states that, “The trustee is responsible to furnish such information concerning the estate and its administration as is requested by a party in interest.” 4. According to Title 11, Section 704 (7), one of the duties of the trustee is, “unless the court orders otherwise, furnish such information concerning the estate and the estate’s administration as is requested by a party in interest.” 5.According to 11 U.S.C. Section 1109(b); “a party in interest, including…a creditor may raise and appear and be heard on any issue in a case und this chapter.” 6. According to the guidelines set up in the U.S. Trustee Manual, Chapter 5-7, entitled “ALLEGATION INVOLVING LOSS OF ESTATE ASSETS BY A PRIVATE TRUSTEE OR AN EMPLOYEE OR AGENT OF A PRIVATE TRUSTEE”, indicates that when assets of an estate are reported missing or there is the “inability to account for estate assets” the procedure is to have a prompt investigation when assets of an estate are reported missing. 7. The public should have access to bankruptcy records. According to 11 U.S.C. Section 107, Public access to papers. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a paper filed in a case under this title and the dockets of a bankruptcy court are public records and open to examination by an entity at reasonable times without charge. (b) On request of a party in interest, the bankruptcy court shall, and on the bankruptcy court’s own motion, the bankruptcy court may- (1) protect an entity with respect to a trade secret or confidential research, development or commercial information; or (2) protect a person with respect to scandalous or defamatory matter contained in a paper filed in a case under this title. ARGUMENT:
1.Harold F. Chorney, Petitioner, has standing to seek an accounting
because he has both property interests as well as pecuniary interests in
the bankruptcy case that are directly affected by the bankruptcy
proceeding and is a party in interest. Petitioner’s property interests and
pecuniary interests include but are not limited to the following: 2. The Chapter 7 Trustee has a fiduciary duty to provide a complete and detailed accounting of the assets of the estate, especially in light of the fact that the two major auction companies involved in the class action settlement are also the same firms involved with evaluating the assets of the estate of Cumberland Investment Corporation.
3. In addition, there may be an appearance of impropriety by the Trustee in
the non disclosure of a detailed and complete accounting of the assets,
especially in light of these facts:
4. The Trustee has never claimed any exemption under title 107 of the code and should supply those documents requested. 5. The Trustee has never supplied any breakdown of the numbers used in his petition as to where the funds in the secured creditor’s fund and those in the unsecured creditors fund are derived from. 6. The Trustee and Republic Credit Corporation I, filed a joint motion to Abandon Assets held by Spink, and for Distribution of Proceeds of the Sale of Secured Creditor’s Collateral on December 2001. (See Docket 724.) CONCLUSION:
It is now time for a complete, detailed and honest accounting of the assets of
the estate, prior to the Trustee issuing a final report, and closing this case. I hereby certify that on this ______day of April 2004, I sent a copy of the above by first class mail to the following:
Jason D. Monzack
Matthew J. McGowan
Warren D. Taft
United States Trustee
Sheryl Serrese
Justin T. Shay
John Boyajian, Esq.
Gerald Aubin
|